Posted on Leave a comment

Registration of historic rights of way and of the benefits of extending the cut-off date for their registration – House of Lords Short Debate

On Tuesday 2nd April the House of Lords held a short debate to discuss the benefits of extending the 2026 cut-off date for registration of historic rights of way. Our President, Baroness Maggie Jones, spoke in this debate in support of an extension with a mention of the society, “… as the President of the Friends of the South Downs – which does fantastic work campaigning to protect and preserve the landscape of the South Downs National Park and providing a huge range of guided walks on the footpaths and bridleways.”

“The rights of way network is one of our nation’s greatest assets: it connects people to nature and our rural environment and describes how our ancestors interacted with, and enjoyed, the landscape over centuries.


Posted on Leave a comment

Sussex Heritage Trust Awards 2014

Robert Cheesman with winners of SDS Special Commendations at Sussex Heritage Lunch, Pangdean 3 July 2014
Robert Cheesman with winners of SDS Special Commendations at Sussex Heritage Lunch, Pangdean 3 July 2014

As we did in 2013, the Society is supporting the annual awards scheme of the Sussex Heritage Trust, designed to recognise and reward high quality conservation and restoration, and good design in new-build projects, and encourage the use of traditional skills and crafts.

South Downs Society Special Commendations were presented earlier today at the Trust’s awards ceremony to two projects making a particular contribution to National Park purposes.

  • The Ditchling Museum of Arts and Crafts which was an ambitious refurbishment coupled with new design that makes a significant contribution to understanding the National Park’s special qualities.
  • Tithe Barn at Sullington Manor farm which has been sensitively restored to enable reuse as an outlet that contributes to the economy of the local community.


We would like to congratulate all those involved in these two projects.

Posted on Leave a comment

A Revamp for English Heritage

The government has been consulting on a possible shake-up for its building conservation watchdog, English Heritage, including the creation of a charitable arm to manage its property portfolio. The Society’s submitted response is below.


English Heritage New Model: Consultation: Comments of the South Downs Society

 These are the comments of the South Downs Society, the national park society for the South Downs National Park. The Society has approximately 2,000 members and its focus is fundraising and campaigning for the conservation and enhancement of the landscape of the national park and its quiet enjoyment. The work of English Heritage is extremely important in contributing to those aims and to the achievement of national park purposes. This society welcomes any moves that will strengthen that work and will, accordingly, be very concerned about any action that might serve to weaken it.

We afford a cautious welcome to the proposal to establish a charitable arm to look after the property portfolio if this facilitates enhanced conservation, interpretation and enjoyment of the properties as well as safeguarding the statutory work. It remains to be seen of course whether the new financial model for the charitable arm is financially sustainable and the funding available to the new Historic England is sufficient to guarantee continuing service delivery. The sum of £80 million on offer to the charitable arm is in itself inadequate to do what is necessary to conserve the heritage assets which would be the responsibility of the new charity, and it will not be acceptable to divert national funding away from other essential conservation work to provide this sum.

We welcome the words in para 4.6 of the consultation document about the need for the revamped Historic England to be “confident”, “independent”, “impartial” as well as “expert”, “constructive”, “visionary”, “proactive”. Time will tell whether all of these can be delivered. The new organisation should, like the property owning charity, be adequately endowed to ensure a strong organisation. For example, English Heritage’s recent record on the listing process for buildings of particular historic or architectural merit has been slow and must be improved. This society and others will keep the work of Historic England under review.

We note that the success criteria for the property owning charity (para 3.29) list in first place the need to remove government funding. We would have preferred to see the other two (“added value”, “increased visitor numbers and satisfaction”) come above that.  We are apprehensive about any government offering, as its prime aim, the opportunity for a public body to become more self-funding.

We would wish to see an undertaking that the revamped body can still be an owner or funder of last resort for important heritage properties under threat.